Turn off Wrap-Around on Stepper controls

+2 votes
asked Dec 11, 2014 in Suggestions by mr-x (520 points)
Thanks. This is a great suggestion. We're seeing lots of cool and necessary ideas like this one that will happen in a future release. At some point we'll probably need to group these things better, since the number of options is getting hard to follow. Thanks for your patience.
Sorry, are you saying that we should remove the current behavior and NOT have it wrap ever? So this should not be optional?
I don't know if anyone uses that "feature", but I guess if you were to get rid of that functionality, you could see if anyone complains. If not, then all is good. If they do, then you could look at creating yet another option...
Informal polls completed today: it would need to be an option, as it's a well-loved feature (surprisingly, but just imagine program changes).
It just occurred to me thinking about this today while working on the manual: You could avoid this behavior by duplicating all the ticks backwards using Named Ticks. So if your current values are 1, 2, 3, 4, instead use 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2... or you could even do 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4...  This is a vile hack, but might work for the time being. Thanks
...